What Expenses Should Be Reimbursed to You as a Food Delivery Driver?

Bradley/Grombacher, LLP • September 28, 2020

The coronavirus pandemic has severely hampered the restaurant industry in America, but many eateries have adapted by embracing takeout and delivery services to keep their kitchens going.

That, in turn, has expanded opportunities for food delivery drivers. Restaurants that never offered home delivery before are offering it now through their own drivers or in connection with one of the national delivery service networks such as DoorDash, Grubhub and Uber Eats.

Even before the pandemic hit though, the food delivery business was expanding thanks to the rise of these national delivery services and the gig economy they are built on.

The result of this expansion has been more food delivery job opportunities in both traditional employment and the gig economy style, each offering different compensation and benefits.

How Much Do Food Delivery Drivers Make?

According to Glassdoor.com, an online job board and employment website, the U.S. national average salary for a pizza delivery driver – the most common of the traditional food delivery driver jobs – is $27,113, with hourly rates varying from $5 per hour to $15, depending on location.

Much like a server in a restaurant, a food delivery driver often depends on tips and gratuities to augment their low base pay.

Food delivery drivers working with food delivery app services including DoorDash, Uber Eats, Grubhub and Postmates, among others, earn their pay through a much more nuanced formula that takes into account things like the time of day and day of the week they are delivering and how busy the app is at the time. The busier the app, the more the drivers are usually paid, according to the industry website RideShareGuy. Location is also a big factor, with drivers in urban areas earning more on average.

A 2018 study published by USA Today, based on job listings and reported wages on Glassdoor and on online job board Indeed, found that Grubhub drivers typically make $11-$12 per hour. A driver working a full 40-hour work week for a year would stand to earn around $24,000 a year.

The average expected salary for a driver for Uber Eats was about the same, slightly higher in urban areas, the USA Today report said. Drivers for DoorDash reported salaries on Glassdoor and Indeed of between $10 and $17.75 per hour, coming out to $20,800 to $36,900 for full-time work for a year. Postmates drivers reported earning between $11 per hour and $19.97 on the job boards, which would put their annual pay at $22,880 to $41,500.

How Can a Food Delivery Driver Get Reimbursed for Expenses?

Food delivery drivers who work as employees can get reimbursed for expenses, such as fuel and wear and tear on their car, if they use their own vehicle to make the deliveries – but not always. Additionally, the rate of reimbursement is often less than the cost of the driver’s actual expense.

Most restaurants that offer their delivery drivers reimbursement for expenses do so at the IRS standard mileage reimbursement rate, which for 2020 is 57.5 cents per mile. According to an article by Medium.com, that rate doesn’t actually cover the real cost to the driver. A 2018 survey conducted by Coworker.org found that 77% of respondents identified “damage or wear-and-tear to their vehicles as one of the main problems they have faced on the job.”

“Drivers say that the damage working in food delivery inflicts on their vehicles cuts significantly into their paychecks,” the article said.

Survey participants said companies aren’t doing enough to offset the cost to drivers for using their personal vehicles. One delivery driver reported clocking 80-120 miles per shift. “You run your vehicle into the ground. Wear and tear on tires, oil changes, and any other damage to your work vehicle are completely on you as an individual with no assistance from the company,” the article said.

Unlike an employee, a food delivery driver working as an independent contractor in the gig economy for services including DoorDash and Uber Eats does not get reimbursed by those companies for their expenses. That’s because they are considered to be self-employed and responsible for their own expenses. The only potential avenue for compensation is through claiming the costs as business expenses when filing their tax returns.

Do Labor Laws Give Delivery Drivers Any Protection?

State and federal labor laws afford protections to delivery drivers who work for companies as their employees – requiring they be paid minimum wages and overtime for hours in excess of the standard workweek hours, that they be offered subsidized health insurance if the company is large enough, and other basic benefits.

Independent contractors have little protection under existing laws. Businesses operating in the gig economy say they are able to operate, in part, because of the lack of regulation over their relationships with the independent contractors working with them.

Legislators in some states have grown concerned that those businesses are taking advantage of vulnerable workers by misclassifying them as contractors when they should be treated as employees. That concern has led, in at least one state, to new laws demanding that certain requirements are met before classifying a worker as an independent contractor.

California lawmakers passed the controversial Assembly Bill 5 (AB5) last year with the intention of protecting people working in the gig economy by forcing companies to reclassify those workers as full-fledged employees. Advocates for the change said it was important to limit a company’s ability to shortchange workers by reaping the benefits of their labor without having to compensate them the same way they do traditional employees.

Opponents have argued the added cost of fully employing the freelance workers would create a burden heavy enough to hurt many businesses and, in turn, the economy.

Although the law went into effect in January, it has been tied up in civil litigation in California’s courts.

Under the terms of California AB5, a worker must be considered an employee, not an independent contractor, unless the business hiring the worker can demonstrate three things:


  • That the worker is free from the control and direction of the hirer in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact.
  • That the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business.
  • That the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed.

What Is California’s Prop 22?

Residents of California will have the power to make some changes to AB5 by voting on Proposition 22 this November, a measure that would exempt food delivery services and rideshare companies from regulation under the controversial law.

If enough voters approve Prop 22, DoorDash, Grubhub, and similar services will be free to continue as before, working with the drivers and independent contractors and not having to fully hire them and provide them mandatory benefits.

The companies themselves are lobbying heavily for Prop 22 and say that, if it fails along with the court battles they’ve waged against AB5, they would be forced to shut down operations in California.

Can Food Delivery Drivers Sue for Being Misclassified as Gig Workers?

Where there are laws, there are penalties for violating those laws.

Business that violate AB5 in California are subject to penalty if the violations can be proven. The law calls for fines of $5,000 to $25,000 per violation and companies found guilty “can be forced to cover payroll taxes, overtime pay and other costs retroactively if workers had been properly classified as employees,” according to a report by the Orange County Register.

Workers who believe they have been misclassified as independent contractors in violation of California AB5 can also file class action lawsuits or individual legal action against their employers. In July, for example, the J.B. Hunt trucking company agreed to settle a class action lawsuit filed against it by 312 independent contract drivers for $6.5 million. The drivers, who filed suit in U.S. Federal District Court for the Central District of California in 2019, will receive about $20,000 each to drop the court case, the trucking industry website Freightwaves reported.


June 5, 2025
At Scanes Yelverton Talbert, LLP, we believe that if you are questioning whether you have a case against your current or former employer, your first step should be to seek legal guidance. The best way to get started is by visiting our website for more information and filling out our online form to connect with our attorneys. Many of these potential claims fall under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which encompasses three distinct types of claims: disability discrimination, failure to accommodate a disability, and retaliation—where an employer takes adverse action against an employee for complaining about discrimination or requesting accommodations. Many of our cases involve ADA claims, which often intersect with claims under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). While both address medical-related workplace issues, they serve different purposes. The FMLA applies when an employee needs to take time off work due to a medical condition. In contrast, ADA claims generally arise when an employee can continue working but requires a reasonable accommodation. Another common claim we handle is workers' compensation retaliation. This occurs when an employee is injured on the job, files a workers' compensation claim, and then faces retaliation from their employer—an illegal action. These are just a few examples of the cases we deal with daily. We also frequently handle cases under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which protects employees from discrimination based on race, religion, sex, national origin, and color. If an employee experiences discrimination on any of these grounds, they may have a valid claim. Additionally, a retaliation claim may also be pursued if an employer retaliates against an employee for taking protected action—such as reporting discrimination to their employer or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). At Scanes Yelverton Talbert, LLP, we are dedicated to defending those facing unjust treatment at work. Understanding your rights is the first step toward justice, whether you're facing discrimination, retaliation, or an employer unwilling to provide reasonable accommodations. We encourage you to visit our website for more information and to fill out our online form to connect with our attorneys. Our team is here to help you explore your legal options and determine the best path forward.
May 13, 2025
At Scanes Yelverton Talbert, LLP, our practice is firmly established in Central Texas, concentrating on the area known as the "iron triangle," which includes Dallas, Houston, and Austin. We are dedicated Texas attorneys who aim to help clients understand the laws of our state regarding personal injury cases. Our team is here to guide you and ensure you are well-informed. Take note of Texas's mandatory minimum car insurance requirement. Every driver must carry at least $25,000 in property damage coverage and $30,000 in bodily injury coverage as part of their car insurance policy. Many insurance policies offer additional coverage beyond these limits, which can be crucial in an accident. Many individuals are unaware that their insurance policies may provide additional coverage for personal injury claims. For instance, Personal Injury Protection (PIP) and Medical Payments (Med Pay) coverage are both no-fault insurances. You are not required to prove the other driver was at fault to receive benefits. These options can provide immediate financial assistance, allowing you to submit medical bills directly to your insurance company for reimbursement. Underinsured and uninsured motorist protection is another essential type of first-party insurance coverage. This coverage can help cover your medical costs if you are hurt in an accident brought on by a driver who does not have enough insurance. For example, if the at-fault driver only carries the minimum coverage and your medical bills exceed $30,000, uninsured or underinsured motorist protection may provide additional compensation for your losses, including pain and suffering. Understanding the effects of Texas tort reform laws—especially those passed since 2003 that restrict recoverable damages—is also crucial. Let's say, for instance, that a government vehicle hurts you. If so, the maximum amount you can get back is determined by whether the car is a state or city vehicle, with the maximum being $100,000 and $250,000, respectively. Furthermore, notification requirements for claims against government agencies are sometimes stringent. They can be as short as one month after the incident. You should seek legal counsel immediately if a government employee has harmed you while performing their duties. Furthermore, changes in Texas law since 2010 have altered how medical expenses are recovered in personal injury cases. In the past, even if an insurance company negotiated a reduced payment, plaintiffs could still get the full amount that medical providers had invoiced. However, recovery is only allowed up to the actual amount paid under the laws. Navigating these complications requires knowledgeable legal counsel to guarantee you get the most money possible under the law. At Scanes Yelverton Talbert, LLP, our mission is to guide clients through the complexities of personal injury law in Texas. If you or a loved one has been injured, we encourage you to visit our website to explore your legal options and connect with our team for further assistance.
May 13, 2025
At Scanes Yelverton Talbert, LLP, we believe that if you are questioning whether you have a case against an insurance company or wondering what constitutes a fair settlement, your first step should be to seek legal guidance. The best way to get started is by visiting our website for more information and filling out our online form to connect with our attorneys. As plaintiff attorneys, we evaluate three key factors to determine whether a case is legally viable. First, do you have liability facts? In other words, did someone legally do something wrong to you? Not every unfortunate event is grounds for a lawsuit. Imagine a Venn diagram: one circle represents all bad events, and the other represents legally actionable claims. The overlap is much smaller, but we move to the next step if your situation falls within that space. Second, do you have sufficient damages? Is it worth your time to file a lawsuit and go through the legal process? At Scanes Yelverton Talbert, we generally advise that if your injury requires hospital treatment, a visit to your primary care physician, or chiropractic care, you likely have enough damages to justify pursuing a claim. Lastly, if you win, can you recover compensation? In personal injury cases, this typically means insurance companies, whether auto insurance, homeowner’s insurance, or business liability coverage. In employment cases, it could be employment insurance or a corporation paying for wrongful termination. The key question is whether there is a viable source of compensation if legal action is necessary. Our goal at Scanes Yelverton Talbert, LLP, is to help you evaluate your claim and understand your legal options. If you are uncertain about your situation, we encourage you to visit our website, fill out our online form, and let our team provide the guidance and assistance needed to determine your best course of action.
May 13, 2025
At Scanes Yelverton Talbert, LLP, we are dedicated to helping people. We are committed to supporting our clients at every stage because we recognize how difficult it may be to navigate legal issues. We are here to ensure every client has a strong advocate because we believe everyone deserves to be heard. Attorneys Bo Routh and Mike Scanes established our practice in 2005. They used to work for a more prominent local general practice law firm. Their goal was to establish a practice that provided excellent legal counsel to those in need and was committed to client advocacy. Today, Mike Scanes remains a senior partner and founding member, while Bo Routh departed at the end of 2021. Following his departure, Tyler Talbert and Ben Yelverton became named partners, officially becoming Scanes Yelverton Talbert, LLP. Tyler Talbert specializes in appellate advocacy, representing clients in Texas and federal appellate courts. He has experience in civil appeals, litigation, and trial support, including motions, error preservation, and jury charges. Ben Yelverton is also an expert in business litigation and personal injuries. He handles matters ranging from class actions to wrongful deaths throughout his early courtroom experience in Austin and Dallas. He is a strategic litigator committed to helping clients get the best results. Another vital member of our law firm is Joel Shields, who has contributed significantly to the expansion and prosperity of the company since joining in 2007. He is Board-Certified in Labor and Employment Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. Joel is an aggressive advocate for his clients and offers wise counsel, whether pursuing claims for someone wrongly fired or advising a company on how to comply with legal requirements. At Scanes Yelverton Talbert, LLP, our passion lies in advocating for individuals. We often represent people in legal battles against large insurance companies or corporations rather than defending corporate entities. Many of our clients come to us in times of need –whether they have been injured in a car accident and are struggling to get their insurance companies to pay or are homeowners whose fire damage claims have been unfairly denied. We also handle employment law cases, ensuring that employees who have been wrongfully terminated or treated unjustly in the workplace receive the representation they deserve. At Scanes Yelverton Talbert, LLP, we advocate for those in need. Whether taking on powerful corporations, advocating for justice, or protecting individuals from unfair treatment, we are here to make a meaningful difference in our clients' lives.
By Kiley L. Grombacher June 21, 2023
Bradley/Grombacher LLP
Abercrombie Clothing Lawsuit Leads to $25 Million Dollar Settlement
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP May 16, 2023
An Abercrombie clothing lawsuit has led to a $25 million settlement over allegations that employees were required to purchase the clothing they were selling in the store.
Join Us For The 2022 Class Action Litigation Conference!
By Marcus J. Bradley September 14, 2022
The program will feature an update of Pending Cases in the 9th Circuit with some SCOTUS discussion, and several important technical issues required for bringing and defending class actions.
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP June 22, 2022
Marcus Bradley is a founder and partner at Bradley/Grombacher, LLP, and focuses much of his practice on complex consumer litigation, class actions, mass torts, product liability, personal injury, and more.
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP June 21, 2022
Kiley Grombacher is a founder and partner at Bradley/Grombacher, LLP, and focuses much of her practice in complex litigation including consumer and employment class actions, product liability, and pharmaceutical mass torts.
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP May 12, 2022
The Harris Martin's MDL Conference is focusing on recalled infant formula and Gardasil.
More Posts